Although the future is a closed book
Anyone doesn't know what happens next moment.
Even Laplace's demon also does.
We don't have any choice except making the patterns as many as possible.
A current standard is no more than a current standard.
Certainly , the future is a closed book. But we can't know inside a closed book from what we can see now.
What we have to do as we prepare for indeterminate selection pressure is making and keeping diversity as much as possible.
I think it is nonsense to make evolution theory a basis for superior thought.
Because we can never judge what establishes the evolution finally , by the current standard , and in the current environment.
If we managed to carry out evolution based on the current standard and ideology , can that evolution keep up holding our superiority in the future , in the environment of indeterminate ?
Because we can never judge what establishes the evolution finally , by the current standard , and in the current environment.
If we managed to carry out evolution based on the current standard and ideology , can that evolution keep up holding our superiority in the future , in the environment of indeterminate ?
This is the essential problem of fascism.
And then , also the reasonableness and benefits of the concept to be the center of the current human rights thought , like freedom , equality , love , and mutual recognition , is able to be explained by applying that theory.
With beyonding something religious , moral and ethical , this theory is quite concerned with the possibility that civilization and species can survive.
And then , also the reasonableness and benefits of the concept to be the center of the current human rights thought , like freedom , equality , love , and mutual recognition , is able to be explained by applying that theory.
With beyonding something religious , moral and ethical , this theory is quite concerned with the possibility that civilization and species can survive.
When we think about the ideal state of ideology , humanity and own way , we should always define prosperity and continuation of the civilization as a purpose.
In the future , we have to verify how each variation affects about life and death of the civilization systematically and logically at both micro and macro view.
In the future , we have to verify how each variation affects about life and death of the civilization systematically and logically at both micro and macro view.
次の瞬間何が起こるかは誰にもわかりません
ラプラスの悪魔にとってもそれは同じでしょう
唯一できることは最多のパターンを用意することです
現在の価値基準は現在の価値基準でしかありません
未来は未知であるが故に「未来」なのです
一寸先は闇ですが明るみから闇は探ることはできません
未知なる淘汰圧への最も堅固な対策は可能な限り多様化することです
ダーウィンの進化論を優勢思想の根拠とするのは非常にナンセンスと言えます
なにをもって進化とするかは現環境の現価値基準では判断しかねるからです
現時点の価値基準や思想を元に恣意的な進化を遂げたとして、それが未来の、未知の環境下での優位性を担保してくれるでしょうか
ファシズム体制の本質的な問題点はここにあるでしょう
また、平等、自由、博愛、相互承認といった今般の社会思想、人権思想の枢軸となる概念の合理性とメリットもこの理論を適用すれば説明がつきます
これは宗教や倫理、道徳上の問題に留まらず、実際に文明と種の存続可能性に大きく関係しています
私達は自分自身のあり方や思想や人道のあり方について考える際に、常に文明の繁栄と存続をそれらの目的として定義するべきだと思います
一つ一つの変化が文明の存亡にどのような影響を与えるか、それをミクロとマクロの両視点において体系的かつ論理的に検証することが求められる時代です
※文法や単語の間違いがあったらコメントなどで教えていただけると助かります
